Monopoly Power

Judge Amit Mehta ruled with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), finding that Google has monopoly power in the search and advertising markets. This finding is hardly a shock. It has been an open secret for years that Google pays Apple an astronomical amount of money each year to ensure that Google search is the default in Apple's Safari browser. In 2022 alone, Apple paid Google over twenty billion dollars. While I have no qualms with the ruling, the Department of Justice is overreaching in a few of their suggested remedies.

A forced sale of the Chrome browser would do little as a remedy toward reducing Google's monopoly power and raises logistical questions about how such a deal would be structured, given that any sale hinges on finding an interested buyer. Companies that could realistically afford to purchase Chrome, such as Amazon, are facing antitrust scrutiny.

Despite their simple appearance, web browsers are incredibly complex applications that must adhere to a myriad of continually evolving web standards. These high development and maintenance costs are the reason most browsers are only one piece in a company's application portfolio – it's extremely difficult to monetize a browser directly without linking it to other services. Therefore, any company that could purchase Chrome would face the same ugly monetization incentives – such as aggressively selling user data to third parties – that we currently have.

Chrome is built from Chromium, an open-source software project created and largely maintained by Google that serves as the backbone of many popular web browsers, including Microsoft Edge. Would Google still be permitted to maintain Chromium, and if so, what is stopping Google from forking the project and creating another browser?

This remedy proposed by the DOJ fails to directly address the lack of competition in the search market. The lack of competition is rooted in the deals Google has made with other companies to keep Google search the default – and often only – search engine on many platforms.

The Tyranny of Expectations

Over the last decade, we’ve witnessed significant consolidation among technology companies. What was once a landscape full of small upstarts vying for dominance has amalgamated into a few unmovable pillars, setting the direction for the entire tech sector. These companies, namely Google, Microsoft, and Apple, have used their power to prevent disruption in the industry. The dominance of tech giants has often stifled competition and innovation, as their vast resources allow them to acquire potential competitors or replicate their products swiftly. This consolidation has led to a tech ecosystem where a handful of companies control vast swathes of data, infrastructure, and consumer attention. Their extensive user bases and integrated ecosystems make it challenging for new entrants to gain a foothold, as the barriers to entry are extraordinarily high. It’s difficult to remember a time when the technology landscape favored the new upstart over these powerful incumbents; however, AI, with its transformative potential and rapid pace of advancement, represents a unique challenge to this status quo.

Startups like OpenAI benefit from a clean slate, unencumbered by legacy products and consumer expectations. This freedom allows them to push boundaries and take risks established companies might avoid. The agility and willingness to embrace failure in AI experimentation can lead to breakthroughs that tech giants, focusing on stability and reliability, may miss. Today’s tech giants are tethered to existing consumer expectations built from years of using their products. Consumers don’t have these same baked-in expectations for upstarts like OpenAI, giving them far more leeway to experiment with an immature technology where results are often unpredictable. Users shrug when ChatGPT provides a result containing gibberish, but a result from Google Gemini instructing people to eat rocks sparks outrage. Ironically, a long track record of creating polished user experiences creates a tyranny of expectations that hurts their ability to innovate with immature, unproven technology.

The long-term future of the tech industry rests on the adaptability of these giants to the AI-driven paradigm shift. Will they leverage their resources to innovate and stay ahead, or will they become victims of their success, unable to move swiftly enough to embrace the new possibilities AI offers? I am confident that Google, Apple, and Microsoft, with their vast resources and established positions, are not at immediate risk of losing dominance. However, artificial intelligence presents an opening for smaller, more nimble competitors in a way we haven’t seen in years. The key is for these giants to recognize the potential of AI and use it to their advantage, ensuring their continued relevance and dominance in the industry.